click here

Suh, J., & Abrams, R. A. (2018, November).  Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by approach and avoidance movements.  Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.

Smith, K. C., Davoli, C. C., Knapp, W. H., & Abrams, R. A. (2018, November).  Please remain standing: Standing alters perception and cognition.  Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.

Smith, K. C., & Abrams, R. A. (in press).  Motion onset really does capture attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

Suh, J., & Abrams, R. A. (2018).  Action influences unconscious visual processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

Weidler, B. J., Suh, J., & Abrams, R. A. (2018).  Action history influences eye movements. Visual Cognition.

Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2018).  Simple actions activate semantic associations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Suh, J., & Abrams. R. A. (in press).  Tool use produces a size illusion revealing action-specific perceptual mechanisms. Acta Psychologica.

Davoli, C. C., Bloesch, E. K., & Abrams, R. A. (in press). The power of the imagination to affect peripersonal space representations.  Visual Cognition.

Suh, J. & Abrams, R. A. (2017, November). Action-planning biases size representation in visual working memory. Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2017). Simple actions influence pop-out search.  Visual Cognition.

Wang, F., Sun, J., Sun, P., Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2017). Influence of simple action on subsequent manual and ocular responses. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

Suh, J. & Abrams, R. A. (2016, November).  Actions to invisible objects bias subsequent vision. Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.

Smith, K. & Abrams, R. A. (2016, November).  Hand proximity influences audition. Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.

Abrams, R. A., Weidler, B. J., & Suh, J. (2015).  Embodied seeing:  The space near the hands.  In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume 63.  Elsevier.

Abrams, R. A. & Weidler, B. J. (2015).  Embodied Attention.  In J. Fawcett, E. Risko, & A. Kingstone (Eds.), Handbook of Attention.  Cambridge: MIT.

Suh, J., & Abrams, R. A. (2015). Reduced object‑based perception in the near‑hand space.  Experimental Brain Research

Abrams, R. A., & Weidler, B. J. (2015, May 18). How far away is that?  It depends on you: Perception accounts for the abilities of others.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.  Advance online publication.

Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2014). Decomposing the action effect: How simple actions affect subsequent perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1242-1252.

Du, F., Zhang, K., & Abrams. R. A. (2014). Hold the future, let the past go: Attention prefers the features of future targets. Cognition, 131, 205-215.

Abrams, R. A., & Weidler, B. J. (2014). Tradeoffs in visual processing for stimuli near the hands. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 383-390.

Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2014). Enhanced cognitive control near the hands. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 462-469.

Sapir, A., Jackson, K., Butler, J., Paul, M., & Abrams, R. A. (2013). Inhibition of return affects contrast sensitivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1305-1316. doi 10.1080/17470218.2013.859282

Suh, J., & Abrams, R. A. (2013, November). Interactions between hand posture and eye movement.Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Toronto, ON, Canada.

Weidler, B. J., & Abrams,R. A.(2013, November). Effects of action on visual search. Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Toronto, ON, Canada.

Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2013). Hand proximity—not arm posture—alters vision near the hands. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 650-653.

Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2013, May). Interactive effects of hand proximity and emotion on vision. Poster presented at the meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Naples, FL.

Du, F., Yang, J., Yin, Y., Zhang, K., & Abrams. R. A. (2013). On the automaticity of contingent capture: Disruption caused by the attentional blink.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 944-950.

Bloesch, E. K., Davoli, C. C., & Abrams, R. A. (2013). Age-related changes in attentional reference frames for peripersonal space. Psychological Science, 24, 557-561.

Brockmole, J. R., Davoli, C. C., Abrams, R. A., & Witt, J. K. (2013). The world within reach: Effects of hand posture and tool-use on visual cognition.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 38-44.

Davoli, C. C., Brockmole, J., Du, F., & Abrams, R. A. (2012). Switching between global and local scopes of attention is resisted near the hands. Visual Cognition, 20, 659-668.

Knapp, W. H., & Abrams, R. A. (2012). Fundamental differences in visual search with verbal and pictorial cues. Vision Research, 71, 28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.08.015

Du, F., & Abrams, R. A. (2012). Out of control: Attentional selection for orientation is thwarted by properties of the underlying neural mechanisms.Cognition, 124, 361-366. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.013

Bloesch, E. K., Davoli, C. C., Roth, N., Brockmole, J., & Abrams, R. A. (2012). Watch this! Observed tool-use affects perceived distance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0200-z

Qian, C., Al-Aidroos, N., West, G., Abrams, R. A., & Pratt, J. (2012). The visual P2 is attenuated for attended objects near the hands. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 98-104. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2012.658363

Bangert, A. S., Abrams, R. A., & Balota, D. A. (2012). Reaching for Words and Non-Words: Interactive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality on the characteristics of reaching movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 513-520. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0234-x

Pratt, J., Radulescu, P., Guo, R., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). It’s alive! Animate motion captures visual attention. Psychological Science, 21, 1724-1730.

Bloesch, E. K., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). Visuomotor binding in older adults. Brain & Cognition, 74, 239-243.

Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Montana, J., Garverick, S., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don’t touch: The effects of posture on reading.Memory & Cognition, 38, 555-562.

Du, F., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). Visual field asymmetry in attentional capture. Brain & Cognition, 72, 310-316.

Dufault, C., Hale, S., & Abrams, R. A. (2009, November). Bilateral shifts of eye movements and attention in younger and older adults. Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.

Davoli, C. C., Abrams, R. A., & Bloesch, E. K. (2009, May). Imagining can make far things near but cannot make near things far. Poster presented at the annual convention of the Association for Psychological Science, San Francisco, CA.

Davoli, C. C., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Reaching out with the imagination. Psychological Science, 20, 293-295.

Du, F., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Onset capture requires attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 537- 541.

Du, F., & Abrams, R. A. (2008). Synergy of stimulus-driven salience and goal-directed prioritization: Evidence from the spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 1489-1503.

Lawrence, B. M., St. John, A., Abrams, R. A., & Snyder, L. H. (2008). An anti-Hick’s effect in monkey and human saccade reaction times. Journal of Vision, 8:26, 1-7.

Christ, S. E., & Abrams, R. A. (2008). The attentional influence of new objects and new motion. Journal of Vision, 8:27, 1-8.

Du., F., & Abrams, R. A. (2008, November). Visual-field asymmetry in the top-down control of attention. Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL.

Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. H., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107, 1035-1047.

Christ, S. E., Castel, A. D., & Abrams, R. A. (2008). The capture of attention by new motion in young and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 63B, 110-116.

Weger, U., Abrams, R. A., Law, M. B., & Pratt, J. (2008). Attending to objects: Endogenous cues can produce inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 16, 659-674.

Davoli, C., Suszko, J., & Abrams, R. A. (2007). New objects can capture attention without a unique luminance transient. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 338-343.

Veiel, L., Storandt, M., & Abrams, R. A. (2006) Visual search for change in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 21, 754-762.

Christ, S. E., & Abrams, R. A. (2006). Abrupt onsets cannot be ignored. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 875-880.

Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2006). Motion onset captures attention: A rejoinder to Franconeri and Simons (2005). Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 114 – 117.

Pratt, J., Lajonchere, C., & Abrams, R. A. (2006). Attentional modulation of the gap effect. Vision Research, 46, 2602 – 2607.

Christ, S. E. & Abrams, R. A. (2006). Just like new: Newly segregated old objects capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 301-309.

Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2005). Onset but not offset of irrelevant motion disrupts inhibition of return. Perception & Psychphysics, 67, 1460 – 1467.

Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2005). The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri & Simons (2003). Perception & Psychphysics, 67, 219-223.

Lawrence, B., Myerson, J., & Abrams, R. A. (2004). Interference with spatial working memory: An eye movement is more than a shift of attention.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 488-494.

Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14, 427-432.

Law, M. B., & Abrams, R. A. (2002). Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1017-1027.

Abrams, R. A., & Law, M. B. (2002). Random visual noise impairs object-based attention. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 349-353.

Christ, S. E., McCrae, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (2002). Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,
9, 80-85.

McCrae, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (2001). Age-related differences in object- and location-based inhibition of return of attention. Psychology & Aging, 16, 437-449

Knapp, W. H., & Abrams, R. A. (2001, November). Automatic Multi-location Inhibition of Return. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
Click here to see the slides.

Abrams, R. A., & Pratt, J. (2000). Oculocentric coding of inhibited eye movements to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 766-788.

Abrams, R. A., & Law, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 818-833.

Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1999). Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 229 – 242.

Abrams, R. A., Pratt, J., & Chasteen, A. L. (1998). Aging and movement: Variability of force pulses for saccadic eye movements. Psychology and Aging, 13, 387-395.

Oonk, H. M., & Abrams, R. A. (1998). New perceptual objects that capture attention produce inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 510-515.

Abrams, R. A., Oonk, H. M., & Pratt, J. (1998). Fixation point offsets facilitate endogenous saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 201-208.

Abrams, R.A., & Pratt, J. (1996). Spatially-diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: A reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22. 1294-1298.

Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1996). Practice and component submovements: The roles of programming and feedback in rapid aimed limb movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 149-156.

Law, M. B., Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 402-408.

Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1343-1353.

Balota, D. A., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Mental chronometry: Beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21,
1289-1302.

Pratt, J., Chasteen, A. L., & Abrams, R. A. (1994). Rapid aimed limb movements: Age differences and practice effects in component submovements.Psychology and Aging, 9, 325-334.

Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). The gap effect and inhibition of return: Interactive effects on eye movement latencies. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 483-487.

Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477.

Abrams, R. A., & Pratt, J. (1993). Rapid aimed limb movements: Differential effects of practice on component submovements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 288-298.

Abrams, R. A., & Balota, D. A. (1991). Mental chronometry: Beyond reaction time. Psychological Science , 2, 153-157.

Abrams, R. A., Meyer, D. E., & Kornblum, S. (1990). Eye-Hand Coordination: Oculomotor control in rapid aimed limb movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 248-267.

Office Hours

(held in 323 Psychology Bldg.)

Spring 2019:
I'm away on sabbatical this semester.  Email me if you'd like to talk.

Announcements

No announcements at the moment...

Tuesday the 26th - Ignore this ad. They are not my webhost. - Powered by HostAfford